Visual Awareness Does Not Perish — From the Surangama Sutra 

Garuda Vanquishing the Naga Clan,ca. 2nd–3rd century Pakistan (ancient region of Gandhara) © Metropolitan Museum of ArtThen King Prasenajit stood up and said to the Buddha, “Before I was instructed by the Buddha, I met Kātyāyana and Vairāṭiputra [Kātyāyana and Vairāṭiputra were contemporaries of the Buddha who taught forms of skepticism.].

Both of them said that after this body dies, we cease to exist and become nothing. That very nothingness itself is what they called nirvana. Now, though I have met the Buddha, I still have doubts that make me cautious. How can I come to realise the true and fundamental mind that neither comes into being nor perishes? All in this great assembly who have outflows wish to hear the answer.” 

The Buddha said to the king, “May I ask, is your body as indestructible as vajra, or is it subject to decay?” 

“World-Honored One, this body of mine will keep on changing till in the end it will perish.” 

The Buddha said, “Your Majesty, you have not perished yet. How is it that you know you will perish?” 

“World-Honored One, my body is impermanent and subject to decay, although it has not perished yet. But now, upon reflection, I can see that each one of my thoughts just fades away, followed by a new thought which also does not last, like fire turning into ash, constantly dying away, forever perishing. By this I am convinced that my body, too, must perish.” 

The Buddha said, “So it is. Your Majesty, you are in your declining years. How do you look now, compared to when you were a boy?” 

“World-Honored One, when I was a child, my skin was fresh and smooth, and I was full of vital energy when in my prime. But now in my later years, as old age presses upon me, my body has withered and is weary. My vital spirits are dulled, my hair is white, my skin is wrinkled. Not much time remains for me. How can all this compare to the prime of life?” 

The Buddha said, “Your Majesty, your body’s appearance cannot have deteriorated suddenly.” 

The king replied, “World-Honored One, the change has in fact been so subtle that I have hardly been aware of it. I’ve reached this point only gradually through the passing of the years. Thus when I was in my twenties, I was still young, but I already looked older than I did when I was ten. My thirties marked a further decline from my twenties, and now, at two years past sixty, I look back on my fifties as a time of strength and health. 

“World-Honored One, as I observe these subtle transformations, I realize now that the changes wrought by this descent toward death are evident not only from decade to decade; they can also be discerned in smaller increments. Considering more closely, one can see that changes happen year by year as well as by the decade. In fact, how could they happen merely year by year? Such changes happen every month. And how could they occur from month to month only? These changes happen day by day. And if one contemplates this deeply, one can see that there is ceaseless change from moment to moment, in each successive thought. Thus I can know that my body will keep on changing till it perishes.” 

Reeds and Geese,dated 11th month, 1343 Tesshū Tokusai Japanese. © The Metropolitan Museum of Art The Buddha said to the king, “Observing these changes — these never- ceasing transformations — you know that you must perish. But do you also know that when you perish, something in you does not perish with you?” 

Putting his palms together, King Prasenajit replied to the Buddha, “Indeed I do not know.” 

The Buddha said, “I now will reveal to you what it is that does not come into being and does not perish. Your Majesty, when you first saw the River Ganges, how old were you?” 

The king replied, “I was three when my beloved mother took me to pay respects to the goddess Jīva. When we went past a river, I knew that it was the Ganges.” 

The Buddha said, “Your Majesty, you said that when you were in your twenties, you had already aged compared to when you were ten. Year after year, month after month, day after day, in each successive thought there have been changes till you have reached your sixties. Consider, though: when you were three years old, you saw the river; ten years later, when you were thirteen, what was the river like?” 

The king replied, “It looked the same when I was thirteen as it did when I was three, and even now, when I am sixty-two, it is still the same.” 

The Buddha said, “Now you are mournful that your hair is white and your face is wrinkled. Your face is certainly more wrinkled than it was when you were in your youth. But when you look at the Ganges, is your visual awareness any different from your visual awareness as it was when you saw the river in your boyhood?” 

The king replied, “No different, World-Honored One.” 

The Buddha said, “Your Majesty, your face is wrinkled, but the es- sential nature of your visual awareness itself has not wrinkled. What wrinkles is subject to change. What does not wrinkle does not change. What changes will perish. But what does not change neither comes into being nor perishes. Then how could it be affected by your being born and dying? So you have no need to be concerned with what such people as Maskari Gośālīputra say: that when this body dies, you cease to exist.” 

 

SurangamaSutra: A New Translation with Excerpts from the Commentary by the Venerable Master Hsuan HuaFrom Surangama Sutra: A New Translation with Excerpts from the Commentary by the Venerable Master Hsuan Hua. Buddhist Text Translation Society, ISBN 978-0881399622

Also see The Host and Guest — From The Surangama Sutra.



Categories: Buddhism, Mahayana, Texts

Tags: ,

10 replies

  1. Sounds like Buddha is saying that your real self is as awareness produced by the body (ie./visual awareness specifically in this example). Our nature as perception itself can only be experienced in the present moment. Awareness of aging and being impermanent happens through analysis in time. Does the experience of being awareness of the present moment produced by the body exist after death? It would be a real delusion to think this…but maybe it can free one from attaching to that which is conditioned by the past and will anticipate the future?
    My apologies, not to be disrespectful, but it sounds like Buddha is saying enlightenment is a comforting illusion, the experience of the deathless as visual perception in the present moment feels liberating–but it dies with the body just like your memories, your genetic personality as well as your conditioned personality.

    • If we’re thinking about awakening we are separating ourselves from it Jenny.

      Look after yourself.

      R

    • Awareness doesn’t belong to the body and isn’t produced by the body because the body can be known (sensation and vision, as subjective experience of the body). visual awareness occurs in the the same space like awareness as all of the the sense bases. the sense base doesn’t generate awareness. it’s actually the other way around. the point is that awareness which is experienced in the now is unborn and is our true nature. also awareness can never be objectified.
      (Edited by Moderator]

  2. Question: “Your Majesty, your face is wrinkled, but the essential nature of your visual awareness itself has not wrinkled. What wrinkles is subject to change. What does not wrinkle does not change” could someone please explain this in the sense of impermanence? Isn’t everything subject to change? I would appreciate anyone’s insight, PHil

    • The Buddha is pointing out the difference between attachment and awareness, the non-impermanence of awareness.

      There is, monks, an unborn, unbecome, unmade, unconditioned. If there were not that unborn, unbecome…, Because there is an unborn, unbecome, unmade, unconditioned, there is escape from the born, become, made, and conditioned. Udana 8.3

      Worth remembering when reading Buddhist texts that the Buddha is speaking from direct experience.

      Hope this helps.

      R

    • Yes! Everything is subject to change. However, if what is being pointed to is NOT a “thing”, this No-thing cannot be subject to change. Only conditioned phenomenon obey the law of impermanence.

      IMO the concept of visual awareness makes ‘Awareness’ an object and therefore, as a concept it is empty of self — because it is impermanent; but as an “experience” it is non-dual and therefore, not subject to the same law. That is my up-to-date understanding. Enrique

  3. Struggling here…visual awareness does not change with age…but contInues the same after death of the body….

  4. it is not just visual awareness but rather awareness in and of itself that is unborn and non-perishing.

Comments

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: