Form is Void by Shen Hui

White yarrow. Devon LaneOne of Shen Hui’s disciples spoke to him one day and said that other masters were teach­ing that form is not different from void and void not differ­ent from form. He’d heard Master Tsiun taking his own body as an example and re­marking that ‘this was Tsiun and at the same time not Tsiun’. Referring to his nose, ears, and each part of his body in turn, he’d considered them and rejected them all as not being Tsiun, saying that they were only fictional designations. ‘That which cannot be per­ceived,’ Tsiun had said, ‘is the void. And form exists only because the relative and the causal exist.’

‘Will you please reveal to me the meaning of this teaching, Master?’

‘Master Tsiun establishes in his explanation a particular principle,’ said Shen Hui, ‘but if one examines the meaning of the Heart Sutra, it is not in agreement with him. In effect, the explanation of Master Tsiun consists in examining particular things in order to understand what the void is. He does not know that the objects of the mind are higher than Mount Sumeru. Listen carefully and I will explain the meaning. Form exists because the mind pro­duces it; void exists because of that which cannot be perceived. It is also said: “It is because of the transcendent nature of things that form exists, and it is because of the nontranscendent nature of form that void exists.” When the sutra says: “Form is not different from void, nor void from form,” that is precisely what it means.

‘Again, it is said: “Perception is form. The perception of that which cannot be seen is void.” The sutra says: “Form is void and void is form. It is the same for feelings, perceptions, men­tal activity and consciousness.'”

For other teachings by Shen-Hui click here.


But for Shen-Hui Zen, as we know it today, would probably be quite different. He was one of the main students of the famous sixth patriarch Hui-neng. However, what is not very well known is that after Hui-neng’s death, the Zen patriarchship first pasted to the leader of the ‘gradual’ school of Zen Shen-hsiu. Shen-Hui went to the Chinese court and made the case for Hui-neng and the teaching of sudden awakening, and after many years had Hui-neng recognised as the sixth patriarch.

First published in the October 1989 Buddhism Now



Categories: Buddhism, Buddhist meditation, Chan / Seon / Zen, Encyclopedia, Mahayana

Tags: , , , ,

6 replies

  1. Form is a product of the mind Mind too is subject to change, No visible, touchable thing as mind, but an energy. Thus, there is no such thing as permanent here. Am I correct.?

  2. This is one of my favorite lessons. Thank you!

  3. Tashi Delek many thks very important Dharma lesson.

  4. Can it be said then that form is an expression of void?

Add your comment.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: